Musings on Japanese and Ryukyu Budo
|
International & Global Education
In psychological and sociological research, 'loving correctly' is closely tied to emotional intelligence, mutual respect, and effective communication. This Form of love is not solely about passion but is characterised by empathy, attentiveness, and a commitment to nurturing emotional connection. According to John Gottman, a renowned psychologist in relationships, one of the critical indicators of lasting love is the practice of 'turning towards' one's partner during both moments of joy and hardship. This involves consistent, small acts of care and kindness, such as a warm hug, a thoughtful note, or a listening ear, that build trust and intimacy over time. In this perspective, love is an evolving practice of mutual support rather than a static emotional state. However, the institution of marriage can, in specific contexts, pose challenges to the sustainability of love and the longevity of a relationship. While marriage is traditionally regarded as a formal commitment that strengthens a partnership, some scholars argue that the legal, social, and economic pressures attached to the institution can inadvertently create tension. These pressures include financial responsibilities, societal expectations, and adherence to traditional gender roles. The obligations inherent within marriage can restrict individual autonomy, which is often crucial for personal growth within a relationship. Esther Perel, a notable scholar on modern relationships, has explored how the traditional confines of marriage may constrain the type of love that thrives on freedom, curiosity, and desire. Perel highlights that relationships require a delicate balance between stability and mystery: while love benefits from security, predictability can stifle it. She argues that marriage, focusing on long-term commitment, often prioritises security at the expense of the spontaneity and excitement that sustain desire. This paradox—between the need for closeness and the simultaneous desire for distance and independence—can result in a loss of the erotic and dynamic aspects of a relationship, which are integral to its vitality. Moreover, sociological research suggests that marriage has historically been more about economic or social alliances than emotional fulfilment in many cultures. As such, it has often imposed external pressures that may not align with the evolving nature of modern love. These pressures create a sense of obligation or duty, which replaces the voluntary, daily choice to love one's partner. In such cases, the emotional connection crucial to love may erode, leaving behind a partnership sustained more by external factors than by genuine affection or companionship. On the other hand, long-term partnerships outside the formal structure of marriage may offer more flexibility for emotional growth and individual autonomy. Without the formal constraints of marriage, partners may feel more empowered to maintain a relationship based on mutual desire and choice rather than societal expectations. This freedom allows for an ongoing negotiation of personal needs, potentially contributing to a more resilient and adaptive relationship. This perspective can instil optimism and encouragement in those navigating their relationships, offering a viable alternative to traditional marriage. In conclusion, while the practice of loving correctly is rooted in emotional intelligence, empathy, and attentiveness, the institution of marriage can, in certain instances, impede the longevity of a loving relationship. By imposing external pressures and prioritising stability over autonomy and spontaneity, marriage may stifle the dynamic elements necessary for love to flourish. However, relationships that prioritise continuous emotional connection, personal growth, and a balance between closeness and independence are more likely to endure in the long term, whether within or outside the framework of marriage. This reiteration underscores the importance of these elements in maintaining a healthy and enduring relationship, providing reassurance and guidance for those seeking such relationships. Okinawan and Japanese Budo
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
James M. HatchInternational Educator who happens to be passionate about Chito Ryu Karate. Born in Ireland, educated in Canada, matured in Japan Archives
November 2024
Categories
All
|
Proudly powered by Weebly