Karate, a traditional yet popular martial art, holds a potent allure for many. Its promise of self-defence, physical mastery, and inner discipline draws diverse individuals seeking physical fitness, personal growth, or even a sense of belonging. However, beneath the rigorous training and intricate kata (forms) lies a darker undercurrent in some karate organisations – one exhibiting cult-like tendencies and attracting individuals yearning for a paternal figure.

Drawing parallels between cults and certain karate organisations requires a nuanced understanding of both entities. Cult characteristics, identified by researchers like Stark (2004) and Dawson (2011), include authoritarian leadership, isolation from external networks, demanding financial commitment, and an us-versus-them mentality. While not all karate organisations exhibit these traits, some undeniably do.

Authoritarian Leadership: The Master as Guru.

At the heart of many cult-like karate organisations lies a charismatic leader – often the head instructor or founder – who wields immense power and influence over students. This power dynamic fosters unquestioning obedience and devotion, blurring the lines between instructor and guru. Leaders typically portray themselves as the sole possessors of true knowledge, demanding unwavering loyalty and compliance from their students. This creates an environment where dissent is suppressed, and students become dependent on the leader's approval for advancement and validation.

To delve deeper, it's essential to recognise how the authoritarian leadership in certain karate organisations extends beyond the training floor. These leaders may involve themselves in every aspect of their students' lives, dictating not only their training regimen but also influencing personal decisions. The guru-like figure becomes a central authority, shaping the worldview and values of the practitioners.

In some cases this guru like status is passed down between member of a particular bloodline even when the evidence is clear that these members have not trained their skill or understanding to a level worthy of leading the organisation.

​Indeed in some cases they demonstrate no leadership skills.

Isolation from External Networks: Building Walls Inside the Dojo.

Cult-like organisations often isolate their members from external influences, creating a closed-loop system where the group's beliefs and teachings hold primacy. This is evident in some karate organisations that discourage contact with outsiders or rival schools, fostering a sense of exclusivity and dependence on the internal community. This isolation can be achieved through controlled information access, restricted social interactions, and even geographical relocation to secluded training facilities.

The extent of this isolation goes beyond limiting interactions with external networks. In certain karate organisations, practitioners may find themselves discouraged from engaging with other martial arts communities or attending events outside the dojo. This insular approach aims to reinforce the belief that the karate organisation is the sole custodian of true martial knowledge, creating a psychological barrier that discourages members from seeking alternative perspectives.

Most importantly in my experience however is the self-imposed isolation many seniors impose upon themselves. They are not open to new ideas or try to hide their own ideas behind a charade of 'well, the founder probably' knew this, but it has been forgotten. However, the most feared organisations are those with a rigid structure where other members are bullied into submitting to the normative narrative by seniors. Such organisations should be avoided at all costs by anyone who truly wishes to understand the martial way.**

Demanding Financial Commitment: Sacrifice for the Dojo's Sake.

Financial exploitation is another hallmark of many cults, and some karate organisations exhibit similar tendencies. Exorbitant fees for lessons, mandatory participation in expensive seminars or retreats, and pressure to purchase exclusive equipment can financially drain members. Such demands are often justified through appeals to loyalty and advancement within the organisation, framing financial sacrifice as a necessary step on the path to enlightenment or mastery.

The financial commitment expected from members in certain karate organisations extends beyond the tangible costs. It becomes a symbolic sacrifice, reinforcing their dedication to the dojo and its leadership. Members may perceive these financial sacrifices as necessary investments in their personal growth, further solidifying their emotional and financial ties to the organisation.

Perhaps the most pernicious form of financial control is that of controlling workshops both given and attended by members. Telling a student what they can spend their money on is as bad as telling them who they can train with. Some teachers carry this to levels of paranoia where they see any and all offers by others within the organisation to train or offer workshops as a financial attack on them personally.

Us-Versus-Them Mentality: Creating a Fortress Dojo.

Cults thrive on fostering a sense of "us" versus "them," creating an in-group of chosen people and demonising external influences. This is not uncommon in some karate organisations, where instructors cultivate an attitude of superiority towards other martial arts styles or even rival karate dojos. This mentality can create a siege mentality, further isolating members and reinforcing their dependence on the organisation for safety and validation.

Expanding on this, the "us-versus-them" mentality in certain karate organisations goes beyond mere rivalry with other martial arts schools. It seeps into the fabric of practitioners' identities, shaping how they perceive themselves and their place in the world. The sense of belonging to an exclusive group becomes a source of pride, further deepening the psychological bonds that tie members to the organisation.

I have personally witnessed that the greatest anger is often demonstrated at those who were once members and have now left to join a different organisation, were asked to leave due to their personal insight into karate or simply walked away from an organisation due to its politics. Karate groups tend to hate none as much as the member who has left but continues on the way.**

Seeking the Father Figure: Filling a Void in the Dojo.

Beyond the cult-like methods, karate organisations can also attract individuals longing for a father figure. For some, especially young men without strong paternal role models, the strict yet supportive environment of a traditional karate dojo can fill an emotional void. The authoritarian instructor, with their demanding expectations and perceived wisdom, can become a surrogate father figure, offering guidance, discipline, and a sense of belonging. This phenomenon suggests that the search for a father figure can be a powerful motivator for joining such groups.

Elaborating on this aspect reveals the psychological dynamics at play within the dojo. The instructor's role as a father figure extends beyond the physical training aspects. They may assume a mentorship role, providing not just martial guidance but also life advice. This dynamic can create a profound emotional connection between the instructor and the student, leading the latter to seek approval and validation from the former.

Beyond the Black Belt: Recognising and Exposing Harmful Practices.

While not all karate organisations exhibit these detrimental characteristics, it is crucial to remain vigilant and recognise the potential for exploitation within some. Individuals considering joining a karate dojo should research the organisation's background, leadership structure, and financial practices. Open communication with current members and seeking feedback from external sources can also provide valuable insights. It is crucial to prioritise personal well-being and be wary of environments that exhibit excessive control, financial pressure, or unhealthy dependence on the leadership.

Expanding on this point involves emphasising the importance of awareness and education within the martial arts community. Practitioners and instructors alike should be proactive in educating themselves about the potential signs of cult-like behaviours. Creating a culture of openness and transparency within martial arts organisations can serve as a safeguard against the development of harmful practices. This includes encouraging dialogue, promoting diversity of thought, and establishing channels for reporting concerns without fear of reprisal.

Mythmaking and the Founder.
Karate organisations, like many other institutions, often exhibit a tendency to deify and mythify their founders, elevating them to a status akin to religious reverence. This phenomenon, while common, may present a stark contrast to the reality of these individuals' lives and achievements.

In the realm of martial arts, founders are frequently portrayed as legendary figures possessing unparalleled wisdom, skill, and virtue. Their biographies, however, can be subject to embellishment and selective storytelling, transforming them into almost mythical beings. This deification process often serves the purpose of fostering a sense of tradition, instilling pride in the martial art's lineage, and attracting new practitioners. But make no mistake - it is a lie. It is meant to embellish the no-questioning approach to tradition which so many so-called Hanshi or Soke utilise to self-aggrandise and legitimise what they do.

The reality, however, may be far less glamorous. Founders of karate organisations were, in essence, human beings with their flaws, challenges, and limitations. Historical records and objective accounts might reveal a more nuanced narrative, one that includes personal struggles, controversies, or even departures from the commonly propagated myth.

The deification of founders in karate organisations is fuelled by a desire for a unifying figurehead, a symbol that embodies the essence of the martial art. This personification often extends beyond their martial prowess to encompass moral virtues, philosophical insights, and even a quasi-religious reverence for their teachings.

Critically examining the historical facts behind these founders reveals a human story—rich in achievements, yet marked by imperfections. By acknowledging the real struggles and complexities of these figures, practitioners can develop a more authentic understanding of their martial art's origins. This nuanced perspective allows for a deeper connection with the art itself, appreciating its evolution and the contributions of fallible, yet remarkable, individuals.

The deification and mythification of founders in karate organisations contribute to the creation of a revered legacy. While this tradition enhances the martial art's appeal, it is crucial for practitioners to engage in a balanced exploration of historical truths. Embracing the reality of these founders as human beings allows for a more authentic and meaningful connection to the art, fostering a martial community grounded in both reverence for the past and a realistic understanding of its origins.

As my teacher use to say when I questioned him about Sensei X and all the supposed accolades and dan ranking he held: "When would he have had the time t purse all these budo while developing his own style of karate and running and organisation?". A wise insight.

A Call for Vigilance and Ethical Leadership.

In conclusion, the exploration of cult-like tendencies within certain karate organisations sheds light on the need for vigilance and ethical leadership within the martial arts community. The deeper understanding of authoritarian leadership, isolationist practices, financial demands, and the allure of a father figure provides a framework for practitioners and instructors to critically assess their training environments.

As the martial arts community moves forward, fostering an environment of open dialogue, education, and ethical leadership becomes paramount. By promoting transparency, encouraging diversity of thought, and actively addressing concerns, the community can collectively work towards preserving the positive aspects of karate while safeguarding individuals from potential harm.

With this comprehensive awareness, practitioners can embark on their martial arts journey with a profound understanding of the potential challenges they may encounter. Armed with knowledge, they can navigate the dojo landscape with discernment, ensuring that their pursuit of self-empowerment and personal growth remains untainted by the shadows that may lurk within some karate organisations.

 OR  "Dodokoro: A Martial Odyssey of Self-Exploration and Liberation"

Within the realm of martial arts, the profound teachings of Miyamoto Musashi resonate with enduring wisdom, offering practitioners a philosophical guide to personal growth and self-discovery. The concept of "Dodokoro," derived from Musashi's insights, encapsulates the transformative journey of a martial artist and, by extension, the broader human experience. This reflective blog aims to delve into the notion that, as martial artists and individuals, embracing a system initially imposed upon us is a crucial step towards forging our own unique paths.

The Foundations of Dodokoro

At the core of Musashi's philosophy lies the idea that adherence to a structured system or curriculum is akin to navigating through the early stages of one's martial journey. It is a period of learning how to learn, analogous to the initial stages of academic study. The disciplined training and adherence to established techniques serve as the foundational bedrock upon which the practitioner can build their skills.

Much like the academic process, where we first grasp the fundamentals before venturing into specialised fields, martial artists commence their journey by honing basic techniques. The structure provides a framework for growth, enabling individuals to progressively develop their understanding of the art. In the process, they learn not only the physical aspects of combat but also the mental discipline and resilience required to face challenges.

The Evolutionary Process

As practitioners progress, the Dodokoro concept becomes more apparent. It is a process of evolution, akin to the academic journey where students transition from being recipients of knowledge to contributors. In martial arts, this evolution involves moving beyond the confines of the structured curriculum and embracing a more intuitive and personalised approach.

The transition marks a pivotal moment in a martial artist's growth, where the previously learned techniques and principles cease to be restrictive shackles but rather become guiding lights. The constraints that once bound the practitioner now serve as a compass, offering purposeful guidance in the journey towards mastery. The evolution is not a rejection of the established system but a transcendence, a liberation from the limitations of a rigid framework.

Contribution to the Beach of Knowledge

Drawing parallels with the academic realm, the martial artist's journey mirrors the progression from being a learner to a contributor. The practitioner, having internalised the teachings and principles, is now positioned to contribute their unique insights to the collective knowledge of their martial art. This contribution is akin to adding a grain of sand to the vast beach of knowledge, enriching the art with personal experiences and innovations.

In this stage, the practitioner becomes a creator, synthesising their understanding and experiences to develop new techniques, strategies, and perspectives. The martial artist not only imbibes the essence of Dodokoro but becomes a living embodiment of its principles, showcasing the fluidity and adaptability that define a true master.

Embracing the Kanji of Dodokoro

The essence of Dodokoro can be encapsulated in Japanese kanji, adding a layer of cultural richness to its understanding. The kanji for "dodo" (道) represents the path or way, emphasising the journey that each martial artist undertakes. The character for "koro" (頃) signifies a period or time, highlighting the temporal nature of growth and evolution.

The combination of these kanji beautifully encapsulates the philosophy of Dodokoro – the path and the time taken to traverse it. Each stroke of the brush echoes the martial artist's steps along their journey, from the structured beginnings to the liberated and contributory stages.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Dodokoro philosophy, inspired by Miyamoto Musashi's teachings, provides a profound framework for understanding the martial artist's journey. It reflects the universal truth that growth involves embracing structure initially, transcending limitations, and contributing to the collective wisdom of the art. The parallel with academic learning adds depth to the understanding, emphasising the transformative nature of disciplined pursuit in both realms.

As practitioners of martial arts and seekers of self-discovery, we must recognise that the journey is not a linear progression but a continuous cycle of learning, evolving, and contributing. Dodokoro, with its roots in Musashi's wisdom, serves as a guiding light for those on the path of martial enlightenment, illustrating that true freedom is found in the harmonious dance between structure and liberation. But be warned do NOT expect others to understand or even support you as you select such a challenge. But more than this be weary of your own 'ego' and the lies it will tell you. Humility is a verb...

The Catholic Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed are both foundational statements of Christian faith, rooted in history and theological tradition. Despite their shared purpose of expressing core beliefs, they exhibit distinct characteristics that reflect the historical and theological contexts in which they originated. This comparison will explore their origins, structures, and theological nuances.

Origins:
The Apostles' Creed traces its roots to the early Christian community, believed by some to have its foundation in the teachings of the apostles themselves. Its concise and straightforward language reflects the simplicity of early Christian proclamation. On the other hand, the Nicene Creed has its origins in the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and the First Council of Constantinople in AD 381. These councils aimed to address theological controversies, particularly the Arian heresy, which denied the full divinity of Christ. The Nicene Creed, therefore, emerged as a response to specific theological challenges of its time.

Structural Differences:
In terms of structure, the Apostles' Creed is simpler and more concise. It is divided into three sections, each corresponding to one of the persons of the Trinity – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Its brevity makes it accessible for personal and communal recitation. In contrast, the Nicene Creed is more elaborate, explicitly defining the relationship between the Father and the Son, addressing theological intricacies that arose during the councils. The Nicene Creed begins with an affirmation of belief in one God, followed by an extensive section on the Son's divinity and humanity and concluding with statements about the Holy Spirit.

Theological Emphasis:
Theological nuances also set the two creeds apart. The Apostles' Creed emphasizes the basics of Christian belief – the creation, the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and the hope for eternal life. Its language is straightforward and accessible, making it suitable for teaching and personal confession. The Nicene Creed, however, delves deeper into the nature of the Trinity. It explicitly defines Christ's relationship with the Father, affirming that Jesus is "of one Being with the Father" and highlighting his role in salvation. The Nicene Creed's emphasis on the divinity of Christ is a direct response to the theological controversies that led to its formulation.

Cultural and Regional Variances:
Both creeds have been accepted and used by various Christian denominations, but the Nicene Creed holds a more prominent place in liturgical traditions, particularly in Eastern Orthodoxy and many mainstream Protestant denominations. The Apostles' Creed, while widely accepted, is often more associated with Western Christianity. This regional and cultural variance reflects historical influences and the reception of these creeds within different Christian traditions.

In conclusion, while the Catholic Apostles' Creed and the Nicene Creed share the common goal of expressing Christian beliefs, their origins, structures, and theological emphases set them apart. The Apostles' Creed is a concise expression of fundamental Christian beliefs with roots in the early Christian community, while the Nicene Creed is a more elaborate formulation that addresses specific theological controversies of its time. Both creeds, however, continue to serve as essential statements of faith for Christians worldwide, shaping liturgy, doctrine, and communal worship. to edit.